And was thus able to develop systems that are unmatched today. Even if a Last Database country today considered the possibility of creating a local Google, it would not achieve the same success due to the scarcity of data and, in many Last Database places, of trained human resources. Moreover, it would not make sense to do so. Scale undoubtedly led to efficiency in what could be considered a kind of natural monopoly. It would be very costly for a country to channel such a strategy and the result Last Database would be uncertain.
Competition with the tech giants is pointless in an Last Database economy that has already crowned them kings and lords.12. Only China, with its big data created behind closed doors thanks to its more than 1,300 million users and data producers, was able to develop an artificial intelligence that Last Database today plays the battle as equals with US capitalism. The dispute between winners and losers of that battle is only between these two players in the world economy. The truth is that the gigantic profits generated by these companies by subsuming traditional industrial Last Database companies and offering them all kinds of services that optimize their businesses, through artificial intelligence programmed and designed by Silicon Valley engineers.
Show that dreams of Last Database development and industrialization digital will be difficult to achieve, but not impossible. Indeed, competition makes no sense, but what about complementarity? New services can be created on a national scale with a data sovereignty project that serves to improve public administration, build regional value chains and work from universities and companies on local Last Database artificial intelligence developments to meet national needs. Does it make sense for Google to develop systems that recognize qualities of yerba mate or fruit and Last Database vegetable crops? Are the systems that detect diseases through medical images in Europe and Latin America the same? Are the results completely replicable.